Collision on Southbound I-45 at I-30 in Dallas Closes Lane

A collision involving a tanker truck carrying hazardous material caused a major emergency response and roadway closure on State Highway 349 in Midland. The crash reportedly involved three vehicles near Highway 349 and County Road 173. The tanker overturned during the collision, prompting a hazardous-materials response and the closure of the roadway while emergency crews worked to secure the scene. At least one person was transported to a hospital following the crash. Additional information about the extent of the injuries has not been released. What Happened in the Midland Tanker Truck Crash? Initial reports indicate that three vehicles were involved in the collision and that one of the vehicles was a tanker carrying an acidic material. The tanker overturned, creating concerns about a potential hazardous-material spill. Highway 349 was shut down while emergency responders addressed the crash, assisted those involved, and worked to contain the hazardous material. Authorities had not yet released complete information explaining how the collision occurred or which vehicle initiated the sequence of events. Because the investigation remains ongoing, no conclusions should be drawn about fault. Why Tanker Truck Wrecks Require a Different Investigation A tanker-truck collision can involve issues that do not arise in an ordinary 18-wheeler wreck. In addition to determining how the vehicles collided, investigators may need to examine the tanker itself, the hazardous cargo, how it was loaded, and whether the driver and carrier complied with applicable safety requirements. Potentially important evidence may include: Tanker and tractor inspections Shipping papers and hazmat documentation Cargo identification and placards Electronic logging-device records GPS and telematics information Engine control module data Driver qualification and training records Tank inspection and maintenance records Loading records Dash-camera footage Dispatch communications Crash-scene measurements and photographs A tanker should also be inspected before repairs or disposal whenever possible because physical evidence involving valves, the tank shell, brakes, tires, and other components may help determine what happened. Hazardous-Material Tanker Crashes Can Create Additional Risks When a tanker carrying acidic, flammable, toxic, or otherwise hazardous material overturns, the danger may extend beyond the initial impact. A spill can expose motorists, emergency responders, and nearby property to hazardous substances. It can also require specialized cleanup operations and an investigation into the companies responsible for transporting, loading, maintaining, or handling the cargo. For more information about these cases, read The Wooley Law Firm's guide to oil tanker truck accidents in Texas, hazmat regulations, and liability. The Wooley Law Firm Handles Serious Tanker and 18-Wheeler Cases The Wooley Law Firm has represented people injured in tanker truck and other 18-wheeler crashes and has recovered millions of dollars for injured clients. Serious tanker cases often require immediate investigation because trucking companies, cargo owners, shippers, maintenance companies, and other businesses may possess evidence that can help explain why the wreck occurred. Every case depends on its own facts, and past results do not guarantee a similar result in another case. Injured in a Texas Tanker Truck or 18-Wheeler Wreck? The Wooley Law Firm represents people seriously injured in commercial truck crashes throughout Texas. If you were injured in a tanker truck, hazmat truck, or other 18-wheeler collision, call (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don't pay unless we win. This article is based on preliminary reporting concerning a developing tanker-truck collision in Midland. Additional information about the vehicles, hazardous material, injuries, and cause of the crash may become available. Nothing in this article assigns fault before the investigation is complete. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case is different, and past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Two semi-trucks were involved in a collision on westbound Interstate 20 at Houston School Road in Dallas Thursday morning, October 8, 2026. The crash was reported at approximately 9:50 a.m. Additional information about lane closures, injuries, and the circumstances leading to the collision has not yet been released. What Happened in the I-20 Truck Crash at Houston School Road? At this time, it is not clear how the two semi-trucks collided or whether any passenger vehicles were also involved. Because the wreck involved two commercial trucks, investigators may need to examine evidence from both tractor-trailers to determine the sequence of events and whether either driver or motor carrier contributed to the crash. No conclusions should be drawn about fault until the investigation is complete. Evidence That May Matter After a Two-Truck Collision Commercial truck crashes can involve substantial amounts of electronic and company-maintained evidence. Potentially important information may include: Dash-camera and onboard video Electronic logging-device records GPS and telematics data Engine control module information Driver hours-of-service records Dispatch communications Tractor and trailer inspection records Maintenance histories Cargo and loading information Crash-scene photographs and measurements Witness statements When two semi-trucks are involved, preserving records from both trucking companies can be important because each vehicle may contain evidence showing speed, braking, lane position, and driver activity before impact. Why Early Investigation Matters After an 18-Wheeler Wreck Commercial trucks may be repaired and returned to service after a collision, and electronic data may not be preserved indefinitely. A prompt investigation can help document the physical condition of both trucks and identify available video, telematics, driver logs, and other records before evidence is lost or overwritten. Injured in an I-20 18-Wheeler Wreck in Dallas? The Wooley Law Firm represents people injured in serious commercial truck and 18-wheeler crashes throughout Dallas and North Texas. If you were injured in a truck wreck on I-20 or another Dallas highway, call (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don’t pay unless we win. This article concerns a developing traffic incident. Information about the vehicles involved, injuries, lane closures, and cause of the collision may change as authorities release additional details. Nothing in this article assigns fault before the investigation is complete. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Three people were killed and three others were critically injured in a head-on collision on State Highway 105 southwest of Navasota Thursday evening. According to the Texas Department of Public Safety, the crash involved an SUV and a passenger car on the Washington County side of SH 105 near the Brazos River. DPS said a vehicle was attempting to pass in a no-passing zone before the collision. Three critically injured people were transported by helicopter to a hospital. The Washington County Sheriff’s Office said the crash occurred near the Washington-Grimes County line. SH 105 remained closed while troopers investigated the scene. What Happened in the Fatal SH 105 Crash Near Navasota? The collision happened Thursday evening on SH 105 near the Brazos River. DPS reported that the crash involved an SUV and a car and said that an attempted pass in a no-passing zone contributed to the wreck. Three people died, while three others suffered critical injuries requiring helicopter transport to a hospital. Authorities had not yet released the identities of those involved or a complete reconstruction of the crash. Why Passing-Zone Evidence May Matter In a serious head-on collision, investigators may examine whether one vehicle crossed into an opposing lane and, if so, why. Potentially important evidence may include: Roadway centerline and no-passing-zone markings Vehicle damage and final resting positions Skid marks and debris patterns Dash-camera or surveillance footage Witness statements Electronic vehicle data Cellphone records when relevant Crash-scene measurements and photographs If investigators determine that a driver attempted to pass where passing was prohibited, that evidence may become important in evaluating civil liability. However, the full circumstances of this crash remain under investigation. Head-On Collisions Can Involve Severe Injuries Head-on crashes can be especially dangerous because the forces from two vehicles traveling in opposite directions may combine at impact. In addition to fatalities, survivors of serious head-on collisions may suffer traumatic brain injuries, spinal injuries, fractures, internal injuries, and other conditions requiring extensive medical treatment. Wrongful Death Claims After a Fatal Texas Crash When a person is killed because of another driver’s negligence, certain surviving family members may have potential rights under Texas wrongful-death law. A civil investigation can be separate from the DPS investigation and may examine roadway evidence, vehicle data, available video, witness testimony, insurance coverage, and other information needed to determine how the collision occurred. The Wooley Law Firm represents people injured and families affected by serious and fatal crashes throughout Texas. Call (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don’t pay unless we win. This article is based on preliminary information released by the Texas Department of Public Safety and Washington County authorities concerning an ongoing investigation. Additional information about the people involved and the precise cause of the collision may become available. Nothing in this article assigns fault before the investigation is complete. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.