You have attended physical therapy, taken medication, and tried to get back to your normal routine. Your neck or back still hurts. Now your doctor is recommending an epidural steroid injection or radiofrequency ablation.
Does that mean your injury is more serious? Will the trucking company pay for the procedure? What happens if treatment helps for a few months and the pain returns?
Epidural injections and radiofrequency ablation can be important evidence in a Dallas truck accident claim, but neither procedure creates an automatic settlement value. Your claim must connect the treatment to injuries caused or aggravated by the wreck and document reasonable expenses, your response to care, and any probable future needs.
You do not have to undergo surgery for ongoing pain and physical limitations to deserve careful evaluation. At The Wooley Law Firm, our Dallas truck wreck lawyer helps injured people address these issues while their treatment continues.
What Is an Epidural Steroid Injection?
An epidural steroid injection places anti-inflammatory medication into the epidural space around spinal nerves. A physician may recommend it for certain conditions involving irritated nerve roots, including some disc-related problems.
Cleveland Clinic explains that lumbar epidural injections aim to relieve symptoms and may help a patient participate in rehabilitation. They do not necessarily cure the underlying condition.
Your records should identify the diagnosis, location being treated, symptoms, examination findings, and why the doctor believes the injection is appropriate.
For a claim, “the patient received an injection” tells only part of the story. The supporting records should explain what problem the doctor was treating and how that problem relates to the collision.
Our guide to serious back and neck injuries after a Dallas truck wreck discusses the broader treatment picture.
What Is Radiofrequency Ablation?
Radiofrequency ablation, often called RFA or radiofrequency neurotomy, uses heat to target nerves carrying pain signals. In spine care, it may be used for selected sources of pain, including facet-joint pain.
A doctor may use diagnostic nerve blocks, such as medial branch blocks, to help evaluate whether the targeted nerves are contributing to symptoms before recommending ablation. These blocks and an epidural injection serve different purposes; they are not interchangeable procedures.
According to Cleveland Clinic’s explanation of radiofrequency ablation, relief varies, treated nerves can regrow, and repeat treatment may be considered.
RFA does not establish that every underlying spinal problem has healed. It also does not mean that every patient will need repeated treatment. Your physician must evaluate your response and future options.
How Do Epidural Injections Affect a Truck Accident Settlement?
There is no reliable formula that assigns a dollar amount to each injection or ablation.
A claim involving one procedure can differ substantially from another involving the same procedure. Important questions include:
Did the truck driver or another responsible party cause the collision?
Did the wreck cause a new injury or aggravate an existing condition?
Why did the physician recommend the procedure?
What treatment had already been attempted?
What expenses were reasonably necessary and legally recoverable?
Did the procedure improve pain, function, or both?
Are additional procedures reasonably probable?
How have the injuries affected work and daily activities?
What insurance or other recovery sources are available?
A procedure supports a claim through the evidence surrounding it. Its name alone does not establish causation, medical necessity, or value.
Depending on the evidence, compensation may include recoverable medical expenses, probable future care, lost income, reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, and physical impairment. These losses need individual support; they are not automatic additions to a medical bill.
Recommended Versus Completed Procedures: Why the Difference Matters
If Your Doctor Has Recommended Treatment
A written recommendation can help explain why your physician believes further care is appropriate. It is especially useful when it identifies the diagnosis, proposed procedure, reasons for treatment, expected benefit, and estimated cost.
However, a recommendation is not a completed procedure or an expense already incurred.
There is also a difference between “consider an injection if symptoms continue” and a definite recommendation supported by persistent symptoms and examination findings. Your claim should accurately describe whether treatment is a possibility, a current plan, or a probable future need.
If you have postponed care because of cost, scheduling, another medical condition, or concerns about risks, tell your physician and attorney. Document the actual reason rather than leaving an unexplained gap.
Injured in an Accident?
Free consultation. Tell us what happened and learn what options may be available.
If You Have Completed Treatment
Your claim can include the procedure report, billing records, and follow-up assessment. These records help establish what was performed and what happened afterward.
The treatment history should address whether you improved, how long improvement lasted, and what limitations remained.
Treatment decisions belong to you and your healthcare provider. You should never undergo an injection, ablation, or surgery simply to increase a settlement.
If surgery later becomes a medical recommendation, our article about surgery after an 18-wheeler wreck in Dallas addresses those additional claim issues.
Document Pain Relief and Recurring Symptoms Accurately
Feeling better after a procedure is valuable information. So is experiencing limited relief or a return of symptoms.
Tell your provider about both improvement and remaining problems. Useful details include:
Pain levels before and after treatment, using the scale your provider requests.
When relief began and approximately how long it lasted.
Whether arm or leg symptoms changed.
Improvements in sleep, sitting, walking, driving, or lifting.
Medication changes.
Activities that remain difficult.
When symptoms returned and whether anything new happened.
Specific observations are more useful than a general statement that you are “better.”
For example, if accurate:
“I could sit through a 45-minute meeting after the procedure, but after six weeks I again needed to stand every 15 minutes.”
That describes improvement, duration, and a functional limitation. Do not copy an example into your records unless it reflects your experience.
A brief symptom log may help you remember changes at follow-up visits. It should supplement conversations with your clinician. Report new or worsening symptoms promptly and follow your provider’s instructions.
What If the Injection or Ablation Helps Only Temporarily?
Temporary relief does not automatically mean that you have fully recovered.
Epidural injection benefits vary, and some patients receive little or no relief. RFA benefits also vary, and pain may recur. The clinical meaning of a particular response should come from your treating physician.
For your claim, the important questions are:
What improved?
What symptoms or restrictions remained?
Why does the doctor believe symptoms returned?
What care, if any, is now appropriate?
Improvement should be included honestly in your claim. Recurring pain should also be documented rather than obscured by an earlier note recording a good response.
Likewise, an unsuccessful procedure does not by itself prove that treatment was unnecessary. Your physician’s original reasoning and later reassessment both matter.
Can My Claim Include Repeat Treatment and Future Expenses?
Potentially. But future treatment needs evidence.
Texas courts require support for a reasonable probability that future medical care will be needed and the reasonable cost of that care. The Dallas Court of Appeals discusses this standard in State Farm v. Nicastro.
For an injection or ablation claim, useful support may include your doctor’s explanation of:
The condition requiring continued care.
Whether another procedure is probable or merely possible.
Expected timing and frequency, if reasonably predictable.
How long the projected treatment may continue.
Follow-up visits, rehabilitation, or other related care.
The basis for estimated costs.
An attorney should not assume that one successful procedure means annual treatment for life. A projection needs to fit your condition, treatment response, and medical evidence.
Cost documentation should also distinguish professional fees, facility charges, and other applicable services without counting the same expense twice.
For medical expenses already incurred, Texas law limits recovery to amounts actually paid or incurred by or on behalf of the claimant. A provider’s initial billed total therefore does not automatically establish the recoverable amount.
Why Insurers Dispute Medical Necessity After a Truck Wreck
A trucking insurer may dispute the connection between the wreck and treatment, the need for the procedure, the amount charged, or all three.
“Your MRI Shows Degeneration”
An insurer may argue that age-related changes explain your symptoms.
The evaluation should compare your condition before and after the wreck, including prior symptoms, treatment, imaging, work abilities, and your treating physician’s assessment. An MRI finding alone does not resolve every causation question.
Read more about preexisting injuries after a Dallas truck wreck.
“You Did Not Need Treatment Beyond Physical Therapy”
Your records should explain what conservative treatment was attempted, your response, and why your physician recommended another approach. Imaging should be considered with symptoms and examination findings.
“You Improved, So No Future Care Is Necessary”
Your claim should accurately distinguish lasting improvement from temporary relief and identify any medically supported future needs.
An isolated note saying “significant improvement” should be considered alongside later follow-up records and any continuing restrictions.
“The Charges Are Too High”
The reasonableness of charges is a separate issue from whether treatment was necessary. Itemized bills, payment information, applicable adjustments, and appropriate supporting evidence help evaluate the dispute.
A health plan’s authorization or denial also serves a different purpose from determining damages in a liability claim. Neither automatically resolves what the trucking defendant legally owes.
Should I Settle Before Finishing Pain-Management Treatment?
That decision depends on your case, but the consequences deserve careful review.
A full settlement release generally closes the released injury claim. Later treatment expenses ordinarily cannot be added simply because symptoms return.
Before accepting an offer, discuss your current diagnosis, treatment response, probable future care, available coverage, and the proposed release with your attorney.
Continuing treatment does not suspend legal deadlines, so do not assume that waiting for another procedure preserves your right to sue.
Not every claim must remain open until all treatment ends. The goal is an informed decision supported by your medical outlook and the facts of your case.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is There an Average Epidural Injection Truck Accident Settlement?
An online average cannot reliably predict your outcome. Liability, causation, treatment costs, recovery, future needs, and available coverage can differ substantially between claims.
Can I Pursue a Dallas Radiofrequency Ablation Car Accident Claim?
Yes, a claim may include medically necessary RFA related to injuries caused or aggravated by a negligent driver. You still need evidence supporting responsibility, causation, and damages.
Do I Need Surgery to Have a Serious Truck Injury Claim?
No. Persistent pain, repeated treatment, lost work, and physical limitations can have substantial consequences without surgery. Their significance depends on the evidence.
What If I Am Afraid to Undergo the Recommended Procedure?
Discuss the risks, benefits, and alternatives with your physician. Tell your attorney why you are hesitant so your treatment history accurately reflects your decision. Your care should serve your health.
Talk With a Dallas Truck Wreck Lawyer About Your Next Steps
If you have progressed beyond physical therapy and now face epidural injections, diagnostic blocks, or radiofrequency ablation, your claim should reflect more than a list of bills.
The Wooley Law Firm can help gather treatment records, evaluate disputed expenses, investigate responsibility, and address medically supported future needs before you decide whether to settle.
Call (214) 699-6524 or contact The Wooley Law Firm for a free consultation about your Dallas truck accident claim.
This article provides general information, not medical or legal advice. Treatment decisions should be made with a qualified healthcare provider. Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case is different, and past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Topics
Share This Article
Andrew J. Wooley
Personal Injury Attorney
Andrew J. Wooley is a dedicated personal injury attorney based in Dallas, Texas. He focuses on helping accident victims recover fair compensation for their injuries. With a commitment to personalized service, Andrew works directly with each client to understand their unique situation and fight for their rights.
