News & Legal

Wooley Law Takeaway

A 79-year-old woman was killed after being struck by a vehicle while attempting to cross South Collins Street near Oram Street in Arlington. According to Arlington Police, officers responded to the 1400 block of South Collins Street after receiving reports that a woman in the roadway had been hit by a car. The woman was transported to a hospital, where she later died from her injuries. Police said the driver who struck her immediately stopped, remained at the scene, and cooperated with investigators. The driver was not facing criminal charges at the time of the initial report. Police Say Woman Was Crossing Collins Street Investigators said the 79-year-old woman was attempting to cross Collins Street from west to east when she was struck by a vehicle traveling northbound. Police said she was not in a designated crosswalk at the time of the collision. The victim's identity had not yet been publicly released. Being Outside a Crosswalk Does Not Automatically Resolve Fault Whether a pedestrian was inside a marked crosswalk can be important, but it does not necessarily answer every question about how a collision occurred. Investigators may still examine: the speed of the vehicle; roadway lighting and visibility; whether the driver was distracted; where the pedestrian entered the roadway; how long the pedestrian was visible before impact; whether the driver braked or attempted to avoid the collision; nearby surveillance footage; vehicle event-data recorder information; and witness statements. The fact that the driver remained at the scene and was not criminally charged also does not, by itself, determine whether civil liability exists. Video Could Be Important in a Collins Street Pedestrian Crash South Collins Street is a busy Arlington roadway lined with businesses, apartments, intersections, and parking areas. After a serious pedestrian collision, nearby business cameras, apartment security systems, dashcams, or other video may help reconstruct how the crash occurred. Video can sometimes show the pedestrian's location, the vehicle's movements, traffic conditions, visibility, and whether the driver had an opportunity to react before impact. The Wooley Law Firm has written more about how pedestrian accident lawyers investigate fault when someone is struck while crossing a roadway. Fatal Pedestrian Crashes in Arlington This Collins Street crash is separate from the recent fatal pedestrian collision on westbound I-30 near Center Street in Arlington. Arlington Police report that pedestrian fatalities remain a continuing traffic-safety concern in the city. The department's current traffic-safety statistics list multiple pedestrian deaths in Arlington during 2026. Wrongful Death Claims After a Pedestrian Collision When a pedestrian dies after being struck by a vehicle, certain surviving family members may have a wrongful death claim if the evidence establishes that another person's negligence or other wrongful conduct caused the death. Potential damages can depend on the circumstances and may include losses related to financial support, companionship, mental anguish, and other damages permitted under Texas law. Families can learn more through our Texas wrongful death attorney page or our bicycle and pedestrian accident attorney page. Lost a Loved One in an Arlington Pedestrian Accident? The Wooley Law Firm represents people and families affected by serious pedestrian and motor-vehicle crashes throughout Arlington, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Texas. A fatal pedestrian collision may require review of surveillance footage, vehicle data, witness statements, roadway conditions, police records, and available insurance coverage. Call The Wooley Law Firm at (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don't pay unless we win. Disclaimer This article is based on preliminary information concerning a developing fatal pedestrian collision. Additional or different facts may become available as Arlington Police continue their investigation. Nothing in this article is intended to assign fault to the pedestrian, driver, or any other person before the investigation is complete. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Wooley Law Takeaway

A critical collision was reported on southbound I-35 at US 380 in Denton around 12:35 p.m. Tuesday, September 22, 2026. According to the traffic information provided, the wreck blocked nearly the entire southbound roadway, with only the right shoulder open while emergency crews responded. Early information did not identify the vehicles involved, confirm the number or severity of injuries, or explain what caused the collision. The “critical” designation is a traffic-incident classification and should not by itself be interpreted as confirmation that someone suffered critical injuries. Southbound I-35 Heavily Blocked at US 380 The wreck occurred at one of Denton’s major highway intersections, where I-35 meets US 380/University Drive. With the regular southbound travel lanes blocked and traffic limited to the right shoulder, motorists approaching the scene could encounter severe congestion, emergency vehicles, sudden braking, and vehicles attempting to merge around the closure. The Wooley Law Firm previously reported another major collision on I-35 at US 380 in Denton in June. That was a separate incident. What Evidence May Matter After a Serious I-35 Crash? If the wreck resulted in serious injuries, investigators may need to determine the sequence of events leading up to the collision. Potentially important evidence may include: TxDOT traffic-camera footage; dashcam recordings; police crash reports; witness statements; photographs and videos from the scene; vehicle event-data recorder information; roadway debris and tire marks; vehicle damage patterns; and final vehicle positions. That evidence can help determine whether a vehicle changed lanes, traffic slowed unexpectedly, a driver failed to maintain a safe following distance, or another event contributed to the crash. Other Recent I-35 Crashes in Denton The Wooley Law Firm has also reported on other recent collisions along the I-35 corridor in Denton, including a northbound I-35 crash at Loop 288 and a major I-35E crash near Brinker Road. These crashes are separate and are not known to be related. Injured in an I-35 Wreck in Denton? The Wooley Law Firm represents people injured in serious car and truck crashes throughout Denton County, Dallas-Fort Worth, and North Texas. If you were injured in an I-35 or US 380 collision, an investigation may include obtaining traffic-camera footage, vehicle data, dashcam recordings, witness statements, crash-scene evidence, and available insurance information. Call The Wooley Law Firm at (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don't pay unless we win. Disclaimer This article is based on preliminary traffic information concerning a developing September 22, 2026 collision. Additional or different facts may become available. The “critical” designation shown in the traffic alert does not establish the severity of anyone’s injuries. Nothing in this article is intended to assign fault to any driver, person, or company before the investigation is complete. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Wooley Law Takeaway

The man charged in connection with the September 18, 2026 I-35W crash that killed 18-year-old Ahmed Habib Fadi Dwabe has been released from jail after posting a $15,000 bond. Fort Worth police arrested 27-year-old Sergio Escorza on a charge of intoxication manslaughter following the early-morning crash on southbound I-35W near Seminary Drive. Court and jail records cited by CBS Texas show Escorza was released Sunday after posting bond. Escorza is accused of the offense but has not been convicted. The criminal case remains pending. Habib Dwabe Was Killed After Stopping to Help Fort Worth police said the crash happened at approximately 2:30 a.m. on Friday, September 18, on southbound I-35W near Seminary Drive. Dwabe and his friends were returning from the Fort Worth Stockyards when they encountered another motorist who needed help. Dwabe stopped and got out to assist. Police later arrested Escorza in connection with the crash that killed Dwabe. Dwabe was from Joshua, Texas, and was 18 years old. Escorza Released After Posting $15,000 Bond CBS Texas reported that Escorza was released from jail Sunday after posting a $15,000 bond. People close to Dwabe told the station they believed the bond amount was too low. That reflects their reaction to the release; the amount itself was set as part of the criminal court process. A bond is not a determination of guilt or innocence. Its purpose is generally to establish conditions for a defendant’s release while the criminal case proceeds. Criminal Case and Wrongful Death Claim Are Separate The intoxication manslaughter prosecution is separate from any potential civil wrongful death case. A criminal prosecution focuses on whether the government can prove the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt. A civil wrongful death case examines whether another person’s conduct legally caused the death and what damages may be recoverable under Texas law. A civil investigation may involve: vehicle event-data recorder information; toxicology evidence; police body-camera footage; dashcam and traffic-camera video; witness statements; 911 calls; photographs and measurements from the crash scene; cell phone evidence when relevant; insurance coverage; and the sequence of the multiple impacts. A criminal conviction is not necessarily required before a civil claim can proceed. Evidence Can Still Matter After an Arrest An arrest does not end the investigation into a fatal multi-vehicle collision. Investigators may still need to determine: the precise sequence of impacts; vehicle speeds; braking before impact; where each vehicle was positioned; whether other motorists contributed to the collision; and what video or electronic vehicle data shows. Those issues can matter in a civil case even when criminal charges have already been filed. Families seeking general information can review our Texas wrongful death attorney page. Questions After a Fatal Texas Car Crash? The Wooley Law Firm represents families affected by serious and fatal motor-vehicle crashes throughout Dallas-Fort Worth and Texas. Fatal crashes involving suspected intoxication or multiple vehicles can require an independent review of police records, electronic vehicle data, video, witness testimony, and insurance coverage. Call The Wooley Law Firm at (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don't pay unless we win. Disclaimer This article discusses a pending criminal case. Sergio Escorza has been charged with intoxication manslaughter but has not been convicted and is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in court. This article is based on information available as of September 22, 2026. Additional or different facts may become available as the criminal and crash investigations continue. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Wooley Law Takeaway

A wreck was reported on the southbound I-35E TEXpress lanes near Sandy Lake Road/Whitlock Lane in Carrollton during the Tuesday morning commute on September 22, 2026. According to the traffic information provided, the collision was reported at approximately 7:35 a.m. Early information did not identify the vehicles involved, confirm whether anyone was injured, or specify how many express lanes were blocked. TxDOT identifies Sandy Lake Road/Whitlock Lane as an access point along the I-35E TEXpress corridor through Carrollton. Southbound I-35E TEXpress Crash in Carrollton The wreck occurred along the southbound express lanes near Sandy Lake Road and Whitlock Lane, just north of the President George Bush Turnpike. I-35E TEXpress lanes are separated from the highway’s regular main lanes and have limited entrance and exit points. That can make a crash inside the managed lanes particularly disruptive because motorists have fewer opportunities to leave the roadway or move around an incident. Because the circumstances remain preliminary, it would be premature to determine whether speed, following distance, distraction, an unsafe lane change, or another factor contributed to the collision. Evidence After an Express-Lane Crash If someone was seriously injured, potentially important evidence may include: TxDOT traffic-camera footage; dashcam recordings; toll-lane or roadway surveillance video; police crash reports; witness statements; photographs and videos from the scene; vehicle event-data recorder information; roadway debris and tire marks; and vehicle damage and final resting positions. Video can be particularly useful in an express-lane crash because investigators may need to determine where each vehicle entered the lanes, whether a lane change occurred, and how traffic was moving immediately before impact. Other Serious I-35E Crashes in Carrollton The Wooley Law Firm previously reported a separate fatal southbound I-35E tanker crash in Carrollton near the President George Bush Turnpike in June. That collision involved a commercial tanker and is unrelated to Tuesday morning’s wreck. Injured in an I-35E Crash in Carrollton? The Wooley Law Firm represents people injured in serious car and truck crashes throughout Dallas-Fort Worth and North Texas. If you were injured in an I-35E or TEXpress-lane collision, an investigation may include obtaining traffic-camera footage, vehicle data, dashcam recordings, witness statements, and available insurance information. For more information, visit our Dallas car accident lawyer page. Call The Wooley Law Firm at (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don't pay unless we win. Disclaimer This article is based on preliminary traffic information concerning a developing September 22, 2026 collision. Additional or different facts may become available. Nothing in this article is intended to assign fault to any driver or other person before the investigation is complete. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Wooley Law Takeaway

A 37-year-old man died at John Peter Smith Hospital after being held in the Tarrant County Jail for approximately one day. The Tarrant County Medical Examiner identified the man as Jose Orozco and reported that he was pronounced dead at 12:11 p.m. Tuesday, September 22, 2026, in the JPS Hospital emergency room. His cause and manner of death had not yet been determined. Court records indicate Orozco was arrested by the Fort Worth Police Department and booked into the Tarrant County Jail early Monday on a burglary of a building charge. The Tarrant County Sheriff's Office had not publicly released additional details explaining what happened before he was taken to the hospital. Cause of Death Remains Pending The Tarrant County Medical Examiner's Office will determine Orozco's cause and manner of death. The medical examiner investigates deaths involving unknown circumstances, violence, or other situations requiring a forensic examination under Texas law. Until the medical findings and investigative records are available, it would be premature to conclude why Orozco died or whether any action or inaction by jail personnel, medical providers, or another person contributed to his death. What Should Be Investigated After a Jail Death? When a person dies shortly after entering a county jail, investigators may need to reconstruct the person's medical condition and treatment from the time of booking through the medical emergency. Potentially important evidence may include: intake and medical screening records; jail medical records; medication administration records; requests for medical care; detention officer observation logs; cell-check records; jail surveillance video; body-camera footage; emergency medical records; JPS Hospital records; 911 and dispatch communications; incident reports; and witness statements from inmates and staff. The timing of symptoms and medical treatment can be particularly important when a person dies shortly after being booked into custody. Tarrant County Jail Deaths Receive Multiple Levels of Review Tarrant County has stated in prior in-custody death cases that jail deaths may be reviewed by several entities, including the Sheriff's Office, an outside law-enforcement agency, JPS medical personnel, the Texas Commission on Jail Standards, the Tarrant County Medical Examiner's Office, and the Texas Attorney General's Office. Those reviews do not themselves establish misconduct. Their purpose is to determine what happened and whether jail policies, medical procedures, and legal requirements were followed. Another Tarrant County Jail Death in 2026 Orozco's death comes amid continued scrutiny of deaths involving people held at the Tarrant County Jail. The Wooley Law Firm recently reported on the death of 36-year-old Gemma Leigh Swingle at the Tarrant County Jail. Swingle died in August after being found unresponsive in her cell, and her death remained under investigation when the article was published. The firm has also reported on an earlier Tarrant County in-custody death investigation and a separate case involving an inmate who suffered a serious brain bleed while in custody. These incidents are separate, and the circumstances of each death or medical emergency must be evaluated independently. Jail Death Cases Can Involve Civil Rights and Wrongful Death Issues A death in a county jail can involve legal issues different from an ordinary negligence case. Depending on the evidence, potential claims may involve medical care, monitoring, response to a medical emergency, jail policies, supervision, or constitutional protections for people in custody. Governmental immunity and federal civil-rights standards can also affect what claims may be available. The fact that someone dies while incarcerated does not establish negligence or a constitutional violation. Liability depends on the evidence showing what happened and whether legally actionable conduct contributed to the death. Families seeking general information can also review our Texas wrongful death attorney page. Lost a Loved One While They Were in Custody? The Wooley Law Firm represents families investigating serious injuries and deaths involving Texas jails and detention facilities. A jail-death investigation may require preservation and review of surveillance footage, jail logs, medical records, medication records, incident reports, staff communications, and other evidence showing what happened before the medical emergency. Call The Wooley Law Firm at (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don't pay unless we win. Disclaimer This article is based on preliminary information concerning the September 22, 2026 death of Jose Orozco. His cause and manner of death remain pending, and additional or different facts may become available as the investigation continues. Nothing in this article is intended to allege or imply wrongdoing by Tarrant County, the Sheriff's Office, JPS Health Network, any detention officer, medical provider, or other person or entity before the evidence is fully developed. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Wooley Law Takeaway

A major collision was reported on westbound US 80 at Belt Line Road in Mesquite at approximately 7:00 a.m. Tuesday, September 22, 2026. According to the traffic alert provided, the crash was verified and one westbound travel lane was closed while emergency crews responded. The remaining westbound lane and nearby shoulder/ramp areas were shown open. Early information did not identify the vehicles involved, confirm whether anyone was injured, or explain what caused the wreck. One Westbound Lane Closed at Belt Line Road The collision affected westbound traffic on US 80 near Belt Line Road in Mesquite during the Tuesday morning commute. US 80 is a major east-west corridor through Mesquite, and Belt Line Road is one of the significant interchanges along that stretch. TxDOT and the City of Mesquite have also identified US 80 between Town East Boulevard and Belt Line Road as part of a major reconstruction corridor. With a travel lane blocked during morning traffic, motorists approaching the scene could encounter backups, sudden braking, emergency vehicles, and drivers merging into the remaining open lane. Because information remains preliminary, it would be premature to determine whether speed, distraction, following distance, an unsafe lane change, or another factor contributed to the collision. Evidence After a US 80 Crash in Mesquite If someone was seriously injured, potentially important evidence may include: TxDOT traffic-camera footage; dashcam video; nearby business surveillance footage; police crash reports; witness statements; photographs and videos from the scene; vehicle event-data recorder information; roadway debris and tire marks; and vehicle damage and final resting positions. This type of evidence may help establish how the vehicles were moving immediately before impact and whether one driver changed lanes, braked suddenly, or failed to react to slowing traffic. Other Recent US 80 Crashes in Mesquite The Wooley Law Firm recently reported on a separate US 80 crash at Gross Road in Mesquite⁠, where the left eastbound lane was closed on September 15. The firm also recently covered an 18-wheeler crash on westbound US 80 at the I-635 ramp in Mesquite⁠. These are separate incidents and are not known to be related. Injured in a US 80 Wreck in Mesquite? The Wooley Law Firm represents people injured in serious car and truck crashes throughout Dallas-Fort Worth and North Texas. If you were injured in a US 80 collision in Mesquite, an investigation may include obtaining available traffic-camera footage, vehicle data, witness statements, surveillance video, and insurance information. For more information, visit our Dallas car accident lawyer⁠ page. Call The Wooley Law Firm at (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don’t pay unless we win. Disclaimer This article is based on preliminary traffic information concerning a developing September 22, 2026 collision. Additional or different facts may become available. The “Major” designation shown in the traffic alert is a traffic classification and does not establish the severity of anyone’s injuries. Nothing in this article is intended to assign fault to any driver or other person before the investigation is complete. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Wooley Law Takeaway

An 18-wheeler caught fire on inbound I-69/US 59 near Fannin Street in Houston early Tuesday morning, September 22, 2026, forcing authorities to close all inbound main lanes of the Southwest Freeway. Houston TranStar cameras showed the truck fire at approximately 2:30 a.m. Emergency crews remained at the scene later Tuesday morning as towing and hazardous-materials crews worked on the cleanup. Authorities had not yet confirmed what the trailer was carrying or whether anyone was injured. All Inbound Main Lanes of I-69 Were Closed The fire shut down the inbound main lanes of I-69 near Fannin Street, creating significant traffic problems for motorists approaching central Houston. A tow truck and an emergency hazmat response vehicle were called to the scene. The hazmat response does not necessarily mean hazardous cargo spilled; it may reflect precautions taken because of the truck fire, damaged vehicle components, fuel, or unknown trailer contents. Investigators had not publicly explained what caused the 18-wheeler to catch fire. What Should Be Investigated After an 18-Wheeler Fire? A commercial truck fire can raise questions involving the tractor, trailer, cargo, electrical systems, fuel system, brakes, tires, and maintenance history. Potentially important evidence may include: tractor and trailer inspection records; maintenance and repair documents; brake and tire records; onboard dashcam footage; electronic control module data; GPS and telematics information; driver inspection reports; bills of lading and cargo records; photographs of where the fire originated; and fire department and hazmat investigation records. If the fire began in the trailer, investigators may also need to determine what cargo was being transported and whether any equipment or materials inside contributed to the fire. Why the Cargo Could Matter At the time of the initial report, authorities had not identified the cargo inside the trailer. That information can become important in a commercial-truck investigation because different types of cargo present different fire, loading, containment, and transportation issues. The mere involvement of a hazmat unit does not establish that the truck was carrying regulated hazardous materials. Other Recent Houston 18-Wheeler Fires and Crashes The Wooley Law Firm recently reported on another 18-wheeler fire on I-610 at Market Street in Houston. That August incident was separate from Tuesday's I-69 fire. The firm also reported a fatal fiery 18-wheeler crash on I-69 near Beltway 8 earlier this summer. Injured in an I-69 18-Wheeler Accident? The Wooley Law Firm represents people injured in serious 18-wheeler and commercial-truck crashes throughout Texas. When a truck fire causes a collision, burn injury, smoke exposure, roadway debris, or another injury, an investigation may need to examine the trucking company, vehicle maintenance, cargo, electronic truck records, and other evidence. For more information about commercial-truck claims, visit our Dallas 18-wheeler accident lawyer page. Call The Wooley Law Firm at (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don't pay unless we win. Disclaimer This article is based on preliminary information concerning a developing September 22, 2026 commercial-truck fire. Additional or different facts may become available. Nothing in this article is intended to assign fault to the truck driver, motor carrier, maintenance provider, cargo company, or any other person or business before the investigation is complete. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Wooley Law Takeaway

A crash involving an 18-wheeler and a pickup truck was reported on the East 51st Street bridge in Austin. The collision involved a commercial truck and pickup, but complete details concerning the sequence of the crash, the condition of the drivers, and what caused the collision were not immediately available. Because an 18-wheeler was involved, investigators may need to examine evidence beyond the ordinary police crash report, including electronic truck data, onboard video, driver records, and trucking-company records. Crash Reported on East 51st Street Bridge The collision occurred along East 51st Street in Austin. Bridge and interchange crashes involving large commercial vehicles can require investigators to closely examine lane position, turning movements, vehicle speed, visibility, and the movements of each vehicle immediately before impact. At this stage, there is not enough verified information to determine whether the truck driver, pickup driver, roadway conditions, or another factor contributed to the wreck. What Should Be Investigated After an 18-Wheeler and Pickup Crash? When a tractor-trailer and passenger vehicle collide, potentially important evidence may include: the truck's electronic control module or “black box” data; dashcam and onboard camera footage; GPS and telematics records; electronic logging device information; driver hours-of-service records; dispatch communications; truck inspection and maintenance records; brake and tire records; pickup event-data recorder information; traffic or surveillance camera footage; and photographs and measurements from the crash scene. The physical damage to the pickup, tractor, and trailer may also help investigators reconstruct the vehicles' positions and movements before impact. Why Trucking Company Records May Matter An 18-wheeler crash investigation may extend beyond the individual driver. Depending on the circumstances, relevant parties can include the motor carrier, tractor owner, trailer owner, maintenance company, cargo company, or another business involved in operating the truck. Records concerning driver training, qualifications, dispatch, maintenance, and electronic vehicle data may help determine whether company practices had any connection to the collision. The involvement of an 18-wheeler does not establish that the truck driver or trucking company was at fault. Responsibility should be determined from the evidence. Other Austin Commercial Truck Crashes The Wooley Law Firm has reported on other serious commercial vehicle wrecks in the Austin area, including a commercial vehicle crash on I-35 at Braker Lane and a semi-truck crash on U.S. 290 in Austin that sent four people to the hospital. These are separate incidents and are not known to be related. Injured in an Austin 18-Wheeler Accident? The Wooley Law Firm represents people injured in serious 18-wheeler and commercial truck crashes throughout Texas. If you were injured in a collision with a commercial truck, an investigation may include preserving black-box data, onboard video, driver logs, maintenance records, dispatch communications, witness statements, and available surveillance footage. For more information, visit our Dallas 18-wheeler accident lawyer page. Call The Wooley Law Firm at (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don't pay unless we win. Disclaimer This article concerns a developing September 2026 commercial truck collision. Additional or different facts may become available as authorities investigate. Nothing in this article is intended to assign fault to the truck driver, pickup driver, trucking company, or any other person or business before the investigation is complete. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Wooley Law Takeaway

A major collision was reported on northbound I-35E at I-20 in Dallas during the Monday morning commute on September 21, 2026. According to the traffic alert provided, the wreck was verified at approximately 7:28 a.m. The traffic diagram indicates that multiple right-side lanes and the interchange ramp were closed while emergency crews responded. Early information did not identify the vehicles involved, confirm whether anyone was injured, or explain what caused the collision. Multiple Lanes Closed at the I-35E and I-20 Interchange The collision affected northbound I-35E near its interchange with I-20 in southern Dallas. Crashes at large freeway interchanges can create significant traffic problems because vehicles may be entering the highway, exiting, merging, or changing lanes within a relatively short distance. With several lanes and ramp access affected Monday morning, drivers approaching the scene could encounter substantial backups and sudden merging. Because the circumstances remain preliminary, it would be premature to determine whether speed, distraction, following distance, an unsafe lane change, merging traffic, or another factor contributed to the wreck. What Should Be Investigated After an Interchange Crash? When a serious collision occurs near a freeway interchange, investigators may need to determine the precise movements of each vehicle immediately before impact. Potentially important evidence may include: TxDOT traffic-camera footage; dashcam recordings; nearby surveillance video; police crash reports; witness statements; photographs and videos from the scene; vehicle event-data recorder information; roadway debris and tire marks; and vehicle damage and final resting positions. Video can be particularly useful at an interchange because it may show lane changes, merging vehicles, braking, and traffic conditions leading up to the collision. Other Recent I-35E Crashes in Dallas The Wooley Law Firm has recently reported on other serious I-35E collisions in Dallas, including a major northbound I-35E crash at Woodall Rodgers Freeway⁠ on September 16. These are separate incidents and are not known to be related. Injured in an I-35E Wreck in Dallas? The Wooley Law Firm represents people injured in serious car and truck crashes throughout Dallas-Fort Worth and North Texas. If you were injured in an I-35E wreck near I-20 or another Dallas highway, an investigation may include obtaining available traffic-camera footage, dashcam video, vehicle data, witness statements, and insurance information. For more information, visit our Dallas car accident lawyer⁠ page. Call The Wooley Law Firm at (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don’t pay unless we win. Disclaimer This article is based on preliminary traffic information concerning a developing September 21, 2026 collision. Additional or different facts may become available. Nothing in this article is intended to assign fault to any driver, person, company, or other entity before the investigation is complete. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Wooley Law Takeaway

A crash was reported on northbound US 75 at Spring Creek Parkway in Plano during the Sunday morning commute on September 21, 2026. According to the traffic information provided, the collision was reported at approximately 10:15 a.m. The right northbound lane was closed while emergency crews responded. Early information did not identify the vehicles involved, confirm whether anyone was injured, or explain what caused the collision. Right Lane Closed After US 75 Crash at Spring Creek Parkway The wreck affected northbound traffic on US 75/North Central Expressway near Spring Creek Parkway. With the right lane blocked, drivers approaching the crash scene could encounter congestion, sudden braking, emergency vehicles, and motorists merging into the remaining open lanes. Because information remains preliminary, it would be premature to determine whether speeding, distracted driving, following too closely, an unsafe lane change, or another factor contributed to the wreck. Other Recent US 75 Crashes Near Spring Creek Parkway The Wooley Law Firm previously reported a separate US 75 crash at Spring Creek Parkway on August 20, 2026. That northbound collision closed the left lane and HOV lane. The firm also reported a major southbound US 75 collision at Spring Creek Parkway in June. These incidents are separate and are not known to be related. Evidence After a US 75 Wreck If someone is seriously injured in a highway collision, potentially important evidence may include: TxDOT traffic-camera footage; dashcam recordings; nearby surveillance video; police crash reports; witness statements; photographs and videos from the scene; vehicle event-data recorder information; roadway debris and tire marks; and vehicle damage and final resting positions. Video evidence can be particularly useful in a freeway crash because it may show lane changes, braking, traffic congestion, and vehicle movements immediately before impact. Injured in a US 75 Wreck? The Wooley Law Firm represents people injured in serious car and truck crashes throughout Dallas-Fort Worth and North Texas. If you were injured in a US 75 crash near Spring Creek Parkway or elsewhere in Collin County, an investigation may include obtaining available video, vehicle data, witness statements, insurance information, and other evidence relevant to determining how the collision occurred. For more information, visit our Dallas car accident lawyer page. Call The Wooley Law Firm at (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don't pay unless we win. Disclaimer This article is based on preliminary traffic information concerning a developing September 21, 2026 collision. Additional or different facts may become available. Nothing in this article is intended to assign fault to any driver, person, company, or other entity before the investigation is complete. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Wooley Law Takeaway

Two men were killed in a crash involving two 18-wheelers on eastbound I-20 near Pines Road in Shreveport on Friday, September 18, 2026. According to Shreveport Police, one 18-wheeler crossed the center median, struck a second semi-truck, and overturned. Both drivers suffered fatal injuries and died at the scene. An AirLife medical helicopter also responded. The Caddo Parish Coroner’s Office identified the men as Bobby G. Conner II, 66, of Huntsville, Texas, and Diego L. Gonzalez-Sanchez, 29. I-20 East Closed Near Pines Road The crash shut down eastbound I-20 near Pines Road while emergency crews, law enforcement, and investigators worked at the scene. Authorities initially expected the eastbound interstate to remain closed for approximately four to five hours because of the severity of the wreck and the involvement of two commercial trucks. Police have not yet publicly explained why the first 18-wheeler crossed the median. Why a Median-Crossing Truck Crash Requires a Detailed Investigation A commercial truck crossing a highway median before colliding with another tractor-trailer raises several questions that investigators may need to examine. Potential issues can include: the truck’s speed before leaving its lane; whether the driver lost control; driver fatigue or distraction; steering or braking problems; tire failure; mechanical defects; roadway or weather conditions; whether another vehicle contributed to the loss of control; and whether cargo weight or distribution affected the truck’s stability. The fact that a truck crossed the median does not, by itself, establish why it happened. The electronic and physical evidence may be critical to determining the cause. Evidence After a Fatal Two-Truck Collision A crash involving two 18-wheelers can create two separate sets of commercial-truck records. Potentially important evidence may include: electronic control module or “black box” data from both trucks; dashcam and onboard camera footage; GPS and telematics records; electronic logging device information; driver hours-of-service records; dispatch communications; driver qualification records; tractor and trailer maintenance records; brake and tire inspection records; cargo and loading documents; photographs and measurements from the scene; and witness statements. Investigators may also need to identify the motor carrier, tractor owner, trailer owner, maintenance companies, and other businesses connected to each truck. One Victim Was From Huntsville, Texas The coroner identified Bobby G. Conner II as a Huntsville, Texas resident. That Texas connection may make this crash particularly relevant to families and commercial drivers who regularly travel I-20 between Texas and Louisiana. Interstate trucking cases can also involve companies, insurers, and evidence located in more than one state. Fatal Truck Crashes Can Involve Multiple Companies and Insurance Policies When two tractor-trailers collide, the investigation may extend beyond the individual drivers. Depending on the facts, relevant entities can include: one or both motor carriers; tractor owners; trailer owners; maintenance companies; cargo-loading companies; shippers; and commercial insurers. The involvement of those companies does not mean any particular party was negligent. Their roles and responsibilities must be determined from the evidence. Lost a Loved One in an 18-Wheeler Crash? The Wooley Law Firm represents people and families affected by serious 18-wheeler and commercial truck crashes in Texas. Fatal truck cases can require immediate investigation of electronic truck data, driver records, onboard video, maintenance documents, cargo information, and insurance coverage. For more information about commercial truck cases, visit our Dallas 18-wheeler accident lawyer page. Call The Wooley Law Firm at (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don't pay unless we win. Disclaimer This article is based on preliminary information concerning a developing September 18, 2026 fatal commercial truck crash. Additional or different facts may become available as authorities continue their investigation. Nothing in this article is intended to assign fault to either truck driver, either motor carrier, or any other person or company before the investigation is complete. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Wooley Law Takeaway

Two Marshall residents were killed in a collision involving a pickup truck and an 18-wheeler on U.S. Highway 80 in Hallsville on September 15, 2026. The Hallsville Police Department has now identified the victims as Patricia Segundo de Olvera, 79, and Enrique Olivera, 51, both of Marshall. Police said the crash occurred at approximately 2:00 p.m. in the 200 block of West Main Street, with the vehicles ultimately coming to rest near the intersection of US 80 and FM 450. Significantly, Hallsville Police said preliminary information indicates the 18-wheeler was traveling eastbound in the westbound lane when it collided with the victims’ vehicle. Police have not yet explained why the tractor-trailer was traveling in the opposing lanes. The investigation remains ongoing. Patricia Segundo de Olvera and Enrique Olivera Identified as Victims Police initially withheld the victims’ identities while family notifications and the investigation were underway. Authorities have now identified them as: Patricia Segundo de Olvera, 79, of Marshall Enrique Olivera, 51, of Marshall Both suffered serious injuries in the collision and died as a result of those injuries. Earlier reporting indicated that one occupant died at the scene and the second was transported to a Tyler hospital, where that person was later pronounced dead. The driver of the 18-wheeler was not injured. Police Say 18-Wheeler Was Traveling in the Wrong Direction The most important new detail in the investigation is Hallsville Police’s statement that early information indicates the tractor-trailer was eastbound in the westbound lane before the collision. That raises important questions investigators will likely need to answer, including: Why did the 18-wheeler enter the westbound lanes? How long had it been traveling in the opposing direction? Was the truck attempting a turn or maneuver? Were there traffic-control devices or roadway conditions involved? What did the truck’s onboard electronic systems record? Was the driver distracted, fatigued, impaired, or confused about the roadway? Did any mechanical problem contribute to the truck’s movement? The police department has not publicly answered those questions, and the preliminary finding does not by itself establish all aspects of civil liability. Police Are Asking for Video and Witness Information Hallsville Police said investigators are seeking information from anyone who may have video footage of the collision or who had direct contact with the 18-wheeler driver before the crash. That request highlights how important independent evidence may be in reconstructing the truck’s movements. Potential evidence in a fatal 18-wheeler crash can include: dashcam and surveillance video; electronic control module or “black box” data; GPS and telematics records; electronic logging device information; dispatch communications; driver hours-of-service records; cell phone evidence when legally relevant; tractor and trailer inspection records; driver qualification records; witness statements; and photographs and measurements from the crash scene. Why the Truck’s Electronic Records Could Be Important If police are correct that the 18-wheeler entered opposing traffic, electronic records could help establish when and how that happened. GPS and telematics records may show the truck’s route before the collision. Engine and event-data systems may contain information about speed, braking, throttle position, or other vehicle activity around the time of impact. Driver logs and dispatch records may provide additional context concerning the trip and the driver’s work schedule. Those records can be particularly important in a commercial truck case because some electronic information may be retained only for limited periods under company practices or applicable regulations. Fatal 18-Wheeler Crashes and Texas Wrongful Death Claims A fatal commercial-truck collision can involve more than the individual truck driver. Depending on the evidence, a civil investigation may examine the conduct of the motor carrier as well as the ownership and maintenance of the tractor and trailer. Relevant issues can include driver hiring and qualification, training, supervision, hours of service, vehicle maintenance, and company communications. The involvement of a trucking company does not automatically establish negligence. Responsibility depends on what the evidence ultimately shows. Families can learn more about these claims through our Texas wrongful death attorney page and our Dallas 18-wheeler accident lawyer page. Lost a Loved One in a Texas 18-Wheeler Wreck? The Wooley Law Firm represents people and families affected by serious and fatal commercial-truck crashes throughout Texas. A fatal trucking case may require prompt preservation of onboard video, electronic truck data, GPS records, driver logs, maintenance documents, company communications, witness evidence, and insurance information. Call The Wooley Law Firm at (214) 699-6524 for a free consultation. You don't pay unless we win. Disclaimer This article is based on preliminary information concerning a developing September 15, 2026 fatal truck crash. Hallsville Police have stated that early information indicates the 18-wheeler was traveling eastbound in the westbound lane, but the investigation remains ongoing. Additional or different facts may become available. Nothing in this article is intended to assign legal fault to the truck driver, motor carrier, pickup driver, or any other person or company before the investigation is complete. This article is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.